High-frequency hearing loss, occupational noise exposure and hypertension: a cross-sectional study in male workers
2011

Hearing Loss and Hypertension in Male Workers

Sample size: 790 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Chang Ta-Yuan, Liu Chiu-Shong, Huang Kuei-Hung, Chen Ren-Yin, Lai Jim-Shoung, Bao Bo-Ying

Primary Institution: China Medical University

Hypothesis

Can high-frequency hearing loss be used as a biomarker for occupational noise exposure and its association with hypertension?

Conclusion

High-frequency hearing loss is a good biomarker of occupational noise exposure and is associated with an increased risk of hypertension.

Supporting Evidence

  • The prevalence of hypertension was significantly higher in the high HL (43.5%) and median HL (42.1%) groups compared to the low HL group (33.2%).
  • Workers with high-frequency hearing loss had a 1.48-fold increased risk of hypertension compared to those with low hearing loss.
  • Employment duration was positively correlated with the risk of hypertension among workers with average HLVs ≥ 15 dB.

Takeaway

If workers have trouble hearing high-pitched sounds, they might also have higher chances of having high blood pressure because of the loud noises they work around.

Methodology

The study used pure tone audiometry to measure hearing loss and assessed hypertension through blood pressure measurements and questionnaires.

Potential Biases

There may be exposure bias due to the reliance on hearing loss as a marker for noise exposure instead of direct measurements.

Limitations

The cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and potential confounders like genetic predisposition to hearing loss were not fully controlled.

Participant Demographics

All participants were male workers from an aircraft-manufacturing company.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p = 0.021 for high HL group, p = 0.029 for median HL group

Confidence Interval

95%CI = 1.02-2.15 for high HL group, 95%CI = 1.03-2.05 for median HL group

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1476-069X-10-35

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication