Between-centre differences and treatment effects in randomized controlled trials: A case study in traumatic brain injury
2011

Impact of Centre Differences on Treatment Effects in Traumatic Brain Injury Trials

Sample size: 9978 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Hester F Lingsma, Bob Roozenbeek, Pablo Perel, Ian Roberts, Andrew I Maas, Ewout W Steyerberg

Primary Institution: Erasmus MC

Hypothesis

Do between-centre differences in outcome influence the estimated treatment effect in randomized controlled trials for traumatic brain injury?

Conclusion

Large between-centre differences in outcome do not necessarily affect the estimated treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study included 9978 patients from 237 centres.
  • Mortality was higher in the treatment group with an odds ratio of 1.22.
  • The estimated treatment effect did not substantially change when accounting for between-centre differences.

Takeaway

This study looked at how differences between hospitals affect treatment results for brain injuries. It found that these differences don't change the overall effectiveness of the treatment.

Methodology

Data from the MRC CRASH trial was analyzed using fixed and random effects logistic regression to assess treatment effects and between-centre differences.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to unaccounted differences in care and patient characteristics across centres.

Limitations

Differences in data quality between centres were not considered, which might affect the estimated treatment effect.

Participant Demographics

Patients from 237 centres in 48 countries, median age 33, with a majority being male (81.3%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.00003

Confidence Interval

1.17-1.26

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1745-6215-12-201

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication