Improving Grant Application Peer Review for the NIEHS
Author Information
Author(s): David A. Schwartz, J. Patrick Mastin, Michael Martin
Primary Institution: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Conclusion
The restructuring of the CSR has not significantly affected the overall outcomes of NIEHS applications, but there are concerns regarding lower scores in oncological sciences and less favorable review outcomes compared to other NIH institutes.
Supporting Evidence
- The NIEHS aims to fund high-quality science to understand environmental impacts on human diseases.
- Approximately 70% of applications are reviewed at the NIH Center for Scientific Review.
- NIEHS applications have had less favorable review outcomes compared to other NIH institutes.
Takeaway
This study looks at how the way grant applications are reviewed can affect which research gets funded, especially for the NIEHS, which has faced some challenges.
Methodology
The study involved monitoring and analyzing the outcomes of reviews of NIEHS applications by the CSR.
Potential Biases
NIEHS applications may be at a disadvantage when reviewed in sections where they represent a small percentage of total applications.
Limitations
The evaluation is ongoing, and the reasons for the observed trends are not fully understood.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website