A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of suspected coronary artery disease
2011

Effectiveness of 64-slice CT Angiography for Coronary Artery Disease

Sample size: 3674 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Daniel C Paech, Adèle R Weston

Primary Institution: Health Technology Analysts Pty Ltd

Hypothesis

Can 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography (CTA) serve as an effective alternative to invasive coronary angiography in diagnosing suspected coronary artery disease?

Conclusion

64-slice CTA is a highly effective non-invasive alternative to invasive coronary angiography for excluding significant coronary artery stenosis.

Supporting Evidence

  • CTA showed a sensitivity of 98.2% and specificity of 81.6%.
  • The median negative predictive value was 99.0%, indicating high reliability in ruling out significant stenosis.
  • Results suggest CTA can effectively reduce the need for invasive procedures in patients with suspected CAD.

Takeaway

This study shows that a special type of heart scan can help doctors find out if someone has a serious heart problem without needing to do a more dangerous procedure.

Methodology

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 28 studies comparing CTA to invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected CAD.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to variations in handling equivocal test results across studies.

Limitations

Variability in prevalence of CAD among studies and lack of studies on 256-slice CTA.

Participant Demographics

Patients with suspected CAD, predominantly male, mean age ranging from 53.9 to 68.2 years.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2261-11-32

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication