Family Practice vs Conventional Care in Thailand
Author Information
Author(s): Pongsupap Yongyuth, Van Lerberghe Wim
Primary Institution: National Health Security Office, Nonthaburi, Thailand
Hypothesis
Do self-styled family practices provide better patient care than conventional outpatient departments in Thailand?
Conclusion
Self-styled family practices in Thailand offer more responsive and patient-centered care at a lower cost compared to conventional care.
Supporting Evidence
- Family practices had shorter waiting times compared to public hospitals.
- Family practices were less costly than private clinics and hospitals.
- Patients in family practices had more time to express their concerns.
Takeaway
In Thailand, family doctors without formal training can still provide better care than regular hospitals, helping patients feel heard and keeping costs low.
Methodology
Analysis of 148 taped consultations with simulated patients across various healthcare settings.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the use of simulated patients and the specific complaint chosen for the study.
Limitations
The study focused on a single complaint presented by simulated patients, which may not represent all patient interactions.
Participant Demographics
Simulated patients were three females and three males, averaging 25 years of age.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website