The relative atrial volume ratio and late gadolinium enhancement provide additive information to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy
2011

Using MRI to Tell Apart Two Heart Conditions

Sample size: 70 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Cheng Huaibing, Zhao Shihua, Jiang Shiliang, Lu Minjie, Yan Chaowu, Ling Jian, Zhang Yan, Liu Qiong, Ma Ning, Yin Gang, Jerecic Renate, He Zuoxiang

Primary Institution: Department of Radiology, Cardiovascular Institute and Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College

Hypothesis

Can cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) effectively differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy?

Conclusion

CMR with late gadolinium enhancement and the relative atrial volume ratio can help distinguish constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Supporting Evidence

  • The relative atrial volume ratio was significantly larger in constrictive pericarditis patients compared to those with restrictive cardiomyopathy.
  • Late gadolinium enhancement was present in 31.8% of restrictive cardiomyopathy patients but absent in all constrictive pericarditis patients.
  • CMR provided high-resolution imaging that helped differentiate between the two conditions.

Takeaway

Doctors can use special heart scans to tell if a patient has one of two similar heart problems, which is important for choosing the right treatment.

Methodology

The study included 23 patients with constrictive pericarditis, 22 with restrictive cardiomyopathy, and 25 normal subjects, using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to assess heart function and structure.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and lacked histological proof for all restrictive cardiomyopathy patients.

Participant Demographics

The study included 18 men and 5 women in the constrictive pericarditis group, and 12 men and 10 women in the restrictive cardiomyopathy group.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.006

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.69-0.93

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1532-429X-13-15

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication