Randomised trial: survival benefit and safety of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer
2006

Survival Benefit of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Sample size: 216 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Kümmel S, Krocker J, Kohls A, Breitbach G-P, Morack G, Budner M, Blohmer J-U, Elling D

Primary Institution: Department of Gynecology/Obstetrics, University Medicine Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte

Hypothesis

Does dose-dense chemotherapy improve survival outcomes compared to conventional chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer?

Conclusion

Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy improves survival for patients with node-positive breast cancer compared to conventional treatment.

Supporting Evidence

  • 71 patients (33%) relapsed or died during the study.
  • Four-year rates of disease-free survival were 64% for dose-dense and 58% for conventional chemotherapy.
  • Overall survival rates after four years were 85% for dose-dense and 75% for conventional chemotherapy.

Takeaway

This study shows that a special type of chemotherapy given more frequently can help women with a certain kind of breast cancer live longer.

Methodology

A multicentre, randomised, open-label Phase 3 study comparing dose-dense chemotherapy with conventional chemotherapy in women with node-positive breast cancer.

Potential Biases

The inclusion of patients with >9 positive lymph nodes may have affected overall survival and disease-free survival rates.

Limitations

The study had a relatively small patient population and fewer patients were enrolled than originally planned, which may reduce statistical power.

Participant Demographics

Women aged 26 to 72 years, with a mean age of 53 years, 60% postmenopausal.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.12

Confidence Interval

95% CL, 74–89% for DFS after 2 years

Statistical Significance

p=0.12

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6603085

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication