Review of Skeletonization in Coronary Bypass Surgery
Author Information
Author(s): Rachel M Massey, Oliver J Warren, Michal Szczeklik, Sophie Wallace, Daniel R Leff, John Kokotsakis, Ara Darzi, Thanos Athanasiou
Primary Institution: Department of BioSurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London
Hypothesis
Does the skeletonization technique improve outcomes in coronary artery bypass surgery using radial and gastroepiploic conduits?
Conclusion
Skeletonization of the radial and gastroepiploic arteries may improve angiographic patency without increasing complication rates or operating time.
Supporting Evidence
- Skeletonization may improve angiographic patency compared to pedicled vessels.
- No increased complication rates were found with skeletonization.
- Skeletonization may increase conduit length and the number of sequential graft sites.
- The study suggests insufficient high-quality evidence to recommend skeletonization over traditional techniques.
Takeaway
This study looks at a special way to prepare arteries for heart surgery. It finds that this method might help the arteries work better without causing more problems.
Methodology
A systematic review of studies on skeletonized radial and gastroepiploic arteries in coronary artery bypass surgery was conducted, analyzing outcomes like conduit length, flow, and patency.
Potential Biases
The studies reviewed were heterogeneous and may have publication bias affecting the results.
Limitations
The evidence is relatively poor, with many studies being retrospective and non-comparative, limiting definitive conclusions.
Participant Demographics
Of the 946 patients, 49% received a skeletonized radial artery and 51% received a skeletonized gastroepiploic artery; 51% of radial artery patients and 62% of gastroepiploic artery patients were diabetic.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.01
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website