A spatial analysis of variations in health access: linking geography, socio-economic status and access perceptions
2011

Health Access and Geography: A Study in Leicestershire

Sample size: 8530 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Alexis J Comber, Chris Brunsdon, Robert Radburn

Primary Institution: Department of Geography, University of Leicester

Hypothesis

How do public perceptions of access to health facilities relate to geographic distance, health status, and car ownership?

Conclusion

Access difficulties to health facilities are significantly influenced by health status and car ownership, while geographic distance's impact varies by service type.

Supporting Evidence

  • Long Term Illness significantly predicts access difficulty to GPs.
  • Non-Car Ownership increases the odds of access difficulty to both GPs and hospitals.
  • Geographic distance is a significant predictor for access to GPs but not for hospitals.

Takeaway

People find it harder to get to health services if they are not well or don't have a car, and how far away the service is matters differently for different types of health facilities.

Methodology

Data was collected through an attitudes survey and analyzed using logistic generalized linear models and Geographically Weighted Regression.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in perceptions of access due to personal experiences and the types of facilities respondents considered.

Limitations

The study did not capture reasons for access difficulties or account for age and gender, and relied on perceptions of access rather than actual usage.

Participant Demographics

{"age_distribution":{"18 to 24":145,"25 to 44":1839,"45 to 64":3187,"65 to 74":1561,"75 to 84":1104,"85+":348},"health_status":{"very_good":2377,"good":3622,"fair":1958,"bad":333,"very_bad":60},"disability":{"limiting":1913,"non_limiting":911,"none":5425},"gender":{"female":4816,"male":3530},"ethnicity":{"white_british":7949,"bme":416}}

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Confidence Interval

{"lower":1.49,"upper":2.9}

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1476-072X-10-44

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication