Poor glycated haemoglobin control and adverse pregnancy outcomes in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: Systematic review of observational studies
2006

Impact of Poor Blood Sugar Control on Pregnancy Outcomes in Diabetic Women

Sample size: 5480 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Melanie E Inkster, Tom P Fahey, Peter T Donnan, Graham P Leese, Gary J Mires, Deirdre J Murphy

Primary Institution: Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Dundee

Hypothesis

What is the relationship between glycated haemoglobin levels and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes?

Conclusion

Poor glycaemic control in women with diabetes is associated with significantly increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Twelve studies reported an increased risk of congenital malformations with poor glycaemic control.
  • The pooled odds ratio for congenital malformations was 3.44.
  • Four studies reported a pooled odds ratio of 3.23 for miscarriage associated with poor glycaemic control.
  • Perinatal mortality was associated with poor glycaemic control, with a pooled odds ratio of 3.03.

Takeaway

If a woman with diabetes doesn't keep her blood sugar levels in check during pregnancy, it can lead to serious problems for both her and her baby.

Methodology

A systematic review of observational studies was conducted to analyze the relationship between glycated haemoglobin levels and pregnancy outcomes.

Potential Biases

Potential selection bias and residual confounding were noted due to the observational nature of the studies.

Limitations

The studies varied in definitions of poor and optimal control, and many did not adjust for confounding factors.

Participant Demographics

The studies included women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes from various countries, with sample sizes ranging from 83 to 2459.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 2.30 to 5.15

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2393-6-30

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication