Adding artesunate to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine greatly improves the treatment efficacy in children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria on the coast of Benin, West Africa
2007

Improving Malaria Treatment in Benin

Sample size: 553 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Nahum Alain, Erhart Annette, Gazard Dorothée, Agbowai Carine, Van Overmeir Chantal, Loen Harry, Menten Joris, Akogbeto Martin, Coosemans Marc, Massougbodji Achille, D'Alessandro Umberto

Primary Institution: Laboratoire de Parasitologie, Centre de Recherches Entomologique de Cotonou, Cotonou, Bénin

Hypothesis

Does adding artesunate to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine improve treatment efficacy in children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria?

Conclusion

The combination of artesunate and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine is effective for treating uncomplicated malaria in Benin.

Supporting Evidence

  • The treatment failure rate was significantly lower in the artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine group compared to the other groups.
  • Fever clearance was faster in the SP-AS group than in the CQ or SP groups.
  • By day 28, the PCR-corrected treatment failure rate for the SP-AS group was only 5.3%.

Takeaway

Giving children a mix of two medicines, artesunate and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, helps them get better from malaria faster than using just one medicine.

Methodology

A randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted comparing chloroquine, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine, and their combination with artesunate in children aged 6-59 months.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in treatment allocation and follow-up due to the open-label design.

Limitations

The study may not be generalizable to other regions due to specific local factors affecting malaria treatment.

Participant Demographics

Children aged 6 to 59 months with uncomplicated malaria from the coastal lagoon area of Benin.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 4.3; 58.5

Statistical Significance

p < 0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1475-2875-6-170

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication