Feasibility of the STarT back screening tool in chiropractic clinics: a cross-sectional study of patients with low back pain
2011

Feasibility of the STarT Back Screening Tool in Chiropractic Clinics

Sample size: 475 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Alice Kongsted, Else Johannesen, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde

Primary Institution: Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark

Hypothesis

Can the STarT back screening tool effectively identify risk groups for low back pain in chiropractic patients in Denmark?

Conclusion

The STarT back screening tool is feasible for use in chiropractic practice and effectively identifies risk groups related to psychological factors.

Supporting Evidence

  • 59% of patients were classified as low risk according to the STarT back screening tool.
  • The high risk group had a likelihood ratio of 7.6 for high scores on the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire.
  • Patients in the high risk group reported more days with low back pain compared to other groups.
  • Only 10% of patients showed signs of moderate depression based on the Major Depression Inventory.

Takeaway

The STarT back screening tool helps doctors figure out how much help patients with back pain might need based on their answers to some questions.

Methodology

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 475 patients from 19 chiropractic clinics who completed the STarT back screening tool and other psychological questionnaires.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in self-reported data and the lack of validation of the tool in different populations.

Limitations

The study did not include pain intensity or disability scales, and the chosen cut-point for catastrophising was not documented.

Participant Demographics

Participants were aged 18 to 67, with a mean age of 43; 255 females and 207 males.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI 2.3 - 6.3 for MDI; 95% CI 4.9 - 11.7 for FABQ

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/2045-709X-19-10

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication