The Saccadic and Neurological Deficits in Type 3 Gaucher Disease
2011

Saccadic and Neurological Deficits in Type 3 Gaucher Disease

Sample size: 15 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): William Benko, Markus Ries, Edythe A. Wiggs, Roscoe O. Brady, Raphael Schiffmann, Edmond J. FitzGibbon

Primary Institution: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health

Hypothesis

To characterize the saccadic eye movements in patients with type 3 Gaucher disease in relationship to neurological and neurophysiological abnormalities.

Conclusion

Patients with type 3 Gaucher disease exhibit significant saccadic eye movement abnormalities that can serve as endpoints for therapeutic clinical trials.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients with type 3 Gaucher disease had a significantly higher regression slope of duration vs amplitude for saccades compared to healthy controls.
  • Saccadic latency was significantly increased for horizontal saccades only.
  • Downward saccades were more affected than upward saccades.
  • Saccade abnormalities increased over time in some patients reflecting the slowly progressive nature of the disease.
  • Vertical saccade peak duration vs amplitude slope significantly correlated with IQ.

Takeaway

This study looked at how patients with a specific disease called Gaucher disease move their eyes. It found that their eye movements are slower and can help doctors understand how the disease affects them.

Methodology

The study followed 15 patients with type 3 Gaucher disease over 4 years, measuring their saccadic eye movements using the scleral search coil method.

Potential Biases

The patients were all on enzyme replacement therapy, which may influence the results.

Limitations

The study's patients were referred to a research institution and may not represent the general population of patients with Gaucher disease.

Participant Demographics

8 males and 7 females, ages 8 to 28 years, mean age 15.7±5.4.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0022410

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication