Gene and protein nomenclature in public databases
2006

Gene and Protein Nomenclature in Public Databases

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Katrin Fundel, Ralf Zimmer

Primary Institution: Institut für Informatik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Hypothesis

How do different public databases compare in terms of gene and protein name ambiguity and overlap?

Conclusion

Combining data from different databases results in larger and less ambiguous gene and protein name dictionaries.

Supporting Evidence

  • The number of genes/proteins and synonyms varies significantly across databases.
  • Ambiguity of synonyms differs between organisms.
  • Curation of combined dictionaries increases size and decreases ambiguity.

Takeaway

This study shows that different databases have different names for the same genes and proteins, and combining them helps make a better list of names.

Methodology

The study compiled gene and protein name dictionaries from various databases and analyzed their ambiguity and overlap.

Limitations

The study does not establish a gold standard for gene name dictionaries and relies on existing databases.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2105-7-372

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication