Mapping the Economic Costs and Benefits of Conservation
Author Information
Author(s): Robin Naidoo, Taylor H. Ricketts
Primary Institution: Conservation Science Program, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
Hypothesis
Understanding both the economic benefits and costs of conserving ecosystems will help to allocate scarce dollars most efficiently.
Conclusion
The study found that benefits of conservation can exceed costs in certain areas, particularly when considering carbon storage.
Supporting Evidence
- Benefits exceeded costs in some areas, particularly in protected areas and indigenous reserves.
- Carbon storage was the most significant ecosystem service value.
- Spatial cost-benefit analysis can inform conservation planning effectively.
Takeaway
This study looks at how much it costs to protect nature and how much we can gain from it, showing that sometimes protecting nature can be worth more than the money spent.
Methodology
A spatial evaluation of the costs and benefits of conservation was conducted for a landscape in the Atlantic forests of Paraguay, considering five ecosystem services.
Potential Biases
The analysis may be biased due to the assumptions made regarding the economic values of ecosystem services.
Limitations
The study is based on a utilitarian view of conservation and does not consider intrinsic values of nature.
Participant Demographics
The region includes indigenous groups like the Ache and Guarani, as well as smallholder farmers and large landowners.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website