Trends and Biases in Mesophotic Ecosystem Research
Author Information
Author(s): Radice Veronica Z., Hernández-Agreda Alejandra, Pérez-Rosales Gonzalo, Booker Ryan, Bellworthy Jessica, Broadribb Manon, Carpenter Gaby E., Diaz Clara, Eckert Ryan J., Foster Nicola L., Gijsbers Johanna C., Gress Erika, Laverick Jack H., Micaroni Valerio, Pierotti Miriam, Rouzé Héloïse, Stevenson Angela, Sturm Alexis B., Bongaerts Pim
Primary Institution: California Academy of Sciences
Conclusion
The study highlights significant biases in mesophotic ecosystem research, particularly in geographical coverage and research focus.
Supporting Evidence
- The mesophotic.org database now hosts 1500 publications, reflecting a significant increase in research.
- Research efforts are concentrated in a few geographical locations, leading to biases in understanding.
- There is a notable lack of studies in biodiversity hotspots like the Coral Triangle.
- The study emphasizes the need for more equitable research distribution across different regions.
Takeaway
Scientists are studying underwater ecosystems that are hard to reach, but most of the research is focused on just a few places, which isn't fair to all the ocean's habitats.
Methodology
The study involved reviewing and cataloguing 1500 scientific publications related to mesophotic ecosystems.
Potential Biases
The concentration of research in a few locations may lead to a skewed understanding of mesophotic ecosystems.
Limitations
The research is biased towards certain geographical areas and specific taxa, limiting the understanding of mesophotic ecosystems globally.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website