Evidence-informed health policy 1 – Synthesis of findings from a multi-method study of organizations that support the use of research evidence
2008

Supporting the Use of Research Evidence in Health Policy

Sample size: 176 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Lavis John N, Oxman Andrew D, Moynihan Ray, Paulsen Elizabeth J

Primary Institution: McMaster University

Hypothesis

How can organizations effectively support the use of research evidence in developing health policy?

Conclusion

The study provides strong recommendations for organizations to enhance the use of research evidence in health policy development.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study identified seven key recommendations for organizations supporting research evidence in health policy.
  • A diverse project reference group was involved to ensure the study's relevance across different regions.
  • The study achieved a high response rate of 86% for the survey conducted.

Takeaway

This study looked at how different organizations can help use research to make better health policies. It found some important tips for success.

Methodology

A multi-method study involving surveys, interviews, and case descriptions across three phases.

Potential Biases

Potential social desirability bias in responses from organizations.

Limitations

The study had a significant representation from high-income countries, and there may be social desirability bias in responses.

Participant Demographics

Organizations from various countries, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1748-5908-3-53

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication