Age- and Gender-Related Differences in the Geometric Properties and Biomechanical Significance of Intracortical Porosity in the Distal Radius and Tibia
2010

Differences in Bone Porosity and Strength by Age and Gender

Sample size: 151 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Burghardt Andrew J, Kazakia Galateia J, Ramachandran Sweta, Link Thomas M, Majumdar Sharmila

Primary Institution: University of California–San Francisco

Hypothesis

The resolvable level of intracortical porosity changes with age in coincidence with an overall decrease in bone mass.

Conclusion

Cortical porosity increases with age and is associated with significant deficits in bone strength, particularly in postmenopausal women.

Supporting Evidence

  • Intracortical porosity was found to increase with age in both men and women.
  • The biomechanical deficit associated with cortical porosity was significantly higher for postmenopausal women.
  • Age-related differences in cortical porosity were more pronounced than differences in standard cortical metrics.
  • Porosity-related measures provided significant discrimination in bone quality for women in their fifties versus sixties.

Takeaway

As people get older, their bones can get more holes in them, which makes them weaker and more likely to break, especially for women after menopause.

Methodology

High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) was used to image the distal radius and tibia of subjects, and micro-finite element analysis was performed to assess biomechanical properties.

Potential Biases

Potential confounding factors include anthropomorphic characteristics and interethnic differences.

Limitations

The resolution of HR-pQCT limits the size of pores captured, and the study may be underpowered for some age groups.

Participant Demographics

151 subjects (57 male, 94 female; ages 20 to 78 years; diverse ethnic backgrounds).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1359/jbmr.091104

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication