Multigene Analysis of Eukaryotic Diversity
Author Information
Author(s): Yoon Hwan Su, Grant Jessica, Tekle Yonas I, Wu Min, Chaon Benjamin C, Cole Jeffrey C, Logsdon John M Jr, Patterson David J, Bhattacharya Debashish, Katz Laura A
Primary Institution: University of Iowa
Hypothesis
Can increased taxon sampling and multigene data improve the understanding of eukaryotic phylogenetic relationships?
Conclusion
The study shows that while increased taxon sampling helps place diverse eukaryotic lineages within well-supported clades, the six supergroup hypothesis for higher-level eukaryotic classification is likely premature.
Supporting Evidence
- The study included 105 diverse eukaryotic lineages.
- 72 sequences were characterized, with 61 being newly characterized.
- Strong support was found for the 'Opisthokonta' supergroup.
- Limited support was found for the 'Amoebozoa' and no support for 'Chromalveolata', 'Excavata', 'Plantae', and 'Rhizaria'.
- The study highlights the importance of comprehensive taxon sampling.
Takeaway
Scientists studied many different eukaryotes to understand how they are related, but found that some of the big groups we thought existed might not be real.
Methodology
Phylogenetic analyses were performed using four genes from two distinct taxon sets, including 72 newly characterized sequences.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the limited taxon sampling and the use of highly derived taxa.
Limitations
The study's conclusions are limited by the small fraction of microbial eukaryotic diversity sampled and the lack of support for several proposed supergroups.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website