Assessing County Public Health Status Using Peer Groupings
Author Information
Author(s): Norma Kanarek, Ron Bialek, Jennifer Stanley
Primary Institution: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Hypothesis
How can peer groupings of counties be used to assess community health status?
Conclusion
The study found that peer groupings are effective for assessing and comparing community health status across counties.
Supporting Evidence
- 88 peer groupings were developed with an average size of 35 counties each.
- Peer groupings included counties from at least 6 states.
- The project aimed to provide county-specific health status reports.
Takeaway
This study shows that grouping similar counties together helps us understand how healthy a community is compared to others.
Methodology
Counties were grouped based on demographic variables to create peer groupings for health assessment.
Limitations
The peer groupings may not capture all relevant health factors and need to be updated periodically.
Participant Demographics
Counties from various states with diverse populations were included.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website